An Alternating-Offers Model of Multilateral Negotiations
نویسنده
چکیده
I develop an infinite-horizon alternating-offers model of multilateral negotiations, a common means of exchange whose strategic complexity has hindered previous modeling efforts. Multilateral negotiations occur in numerous settings in which one party wishes to trade with one of several others, but for concreteness I consider a buyer facing multiple sellers offering potentially different amounts of surplus to be split. The basic model provides surprising insights about introducing competition to an initially bilateral setting, while straightforward extensions provide empirical predictions about how the buyer’s choice of conducting procurement via multilateral negotiations or auctions is affected by factors including the number of sellers, uncertainty when making the choice, and costs of participating in the procurement process. More generally the model provides a tractable foundation for analyzing strategic problems in settings featuring multilateral negotiations.
منابع مشابه
Verifiable Offers and the Relationship between Auctions and Multilateral Negotiations*
We use the experimental method to compare second-price auctions with verifiable multilateral negotiations in which the sole buyer can credibly reveal to sellers the best price offer he currently holds. Despite the two institutions seeming equivalence, we find that prices are lower in verifiable multilateral negotiations than in second-price auctions. The difference occurs because low-cost selle...
متن کاملEquilibrium Behavior in a Model of Multilateral Negotiations∗ PRELIMINARY DRAFT
This paper characterizes equilibrium behavior in multilateral negotiations, an exchange process in which a buyer attempts to purchase from one of several sellers with privately known production costs. The buyer receives an initial set of price offers, then can try to play the sellers off one another to obtain concessions. Consistent with recent experimental evidence, expected prices in the nego...
متن کاملThe Effect of Offer Verifiability on the Relationship Between Auctions and Multilateral Negotiations
We use the experimental method to compare second-price auctions to “verifiable” multilateral negotiations in which the sole buyer can credibly reveal to sellers the best price offer it currently holds. We find that transaction prices are lower in verifiable multilateral negotiations than in second-price auctions, despite the two institutions’ seeming equivalence. The difference occurs because l...
متن کاملA Comparison of Auctions and Multilateral Negotiations
We compare the well-known first-price auction with a common but previously unexamined exchange process that we term “multilateral negotiations.” In multilateral negotiations, a buyer solicits price offers for a homogeneous product from sellers with heterogeneous costs, and then plays the sellers off one another to obtain additional price concessions. Using experimental methods, we find that tra...
متن کاملDelay in the alternating-offers model of bargaining
Alternating offers bargaining has been extensively used to model two-sided negotiations. The celebrated model of Rubinstein (1982) has provided a formal justification for equitable payoff division. A typical assumption of these models under risk is that the termination event means a complete and irrevocable breakdown in negotiations. In this paper, the meaning of termination is reinterpreted as...
متن کامل